Time is ticking for Banstead residents to have their say on a proposal that could dramatically change the way they drive—and it’s all about safety. The clock is winding down on a consultation to introduce a 20 mph (32.2 kph) speed limit across 14 streets in the area, and if you haven’t weighed in yet, now’s your chance. But here’s where it gets controversial: while the aim is to create safer roads, especially for children walking to school, not everyone agrees it’s the best solution. Surrey County Council (SCC) has put forward this plan, citing 25 injury incidents on these roads in the past five years—12 involving pedestrians and six resulting in serious injuries. That’s a sobering statistic, but is slowing down traffic the answer? The council believes so, arguing that lower speeds reduce the severity of accidents and make streets more family-friendly. And this is the part most people miss: the proposal isn’t just about High Street, Colcokes Road, or Garrard Road—it’s about a broader shift toward prioritizing safety over speed in residential areas. But here’s the question: Will this really make a difference, or are there better ways to protect pedestrians? Let’s dive deeper. For instance, could improved crosswalks, better lighting, or stricter enforcement of existing limits be more effective? The consultation closes on Sunday, so there’s still time to share your thoughts. Whether you’re a parent worried about your child’s safety or a driver concerned about the impact on your daily commute, your opinion matters. What do you think? Is a 20 mph limit the right move, or is there a better way to balance safety and convenience? Let us know in the comments—this is one debate you won’t want to miss.
